Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 SW2D 633 - Chew v. State

Chew v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2008

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

8019912000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 229th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to have a fair trial, the jury should have rendered its verdict based solely on the evidence properly admitted during trial, without considering other detrimental evidence [and aspects] which [were] not properly introduced. The Supreme Court of the United States addressed this issue more eloquently in Brady, stating that “Society wins not only when the guilty are convicted but when criminal trials are fair; our system of the administration of justice suffers when any accused is treated unfairly.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “had a motive to lie initially about her lack of consent to hide her sexual affliction from the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.