Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 SW2D 862 - State v. Post

State v. Post’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2019

12 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jordan · State v. Mooney · State v. Edmondson · State v. Murray · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury was denied the opportunity and ability to act as a sequestered jury [because the jurors] were distracted from 'due and fair consideration of the facts'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No one should be on trial for any crime, much less murder, in such a lackadaisical atmosphere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was replete with suspicion of improper bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.