Ed Udey v. D.C. Kastner, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
805 F.2d 1218 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2017
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Cruz v. Beto · Thorne v. Jones · Hamilton v. Love · Barnett v. Rodgers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although we have every desire to encourage the Government to provide religious dietary alternatives, providing alternatives acceptable to practitioners of “majority” religions while failing to provide alternatives acceptable to practitioners of less common, even unique, religions poses serious Equal Proteetion/First Amendment Establishment concerns. See Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 , 92 S.Ct. 1079 , 31 L.Ed.2d 263 (1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“pray[ing] that the Supreme Court in Shabazz v. O'Lone will bring order to this unholy mess.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinelli v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.