Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

805 F.2d 393

Docket No. 86-6687.

Frizell Stephens v. Edward W. Murray, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections Attorney General of Virginia

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 26, 1986. Decided Nov. 20, 1986.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-11-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Stokes v. Beorn

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1986-11-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (C/A No. 86-59-L)

Frizell Stephens, appellant pro se.

Frank Snead Ferguson, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Murray, C/A No. 86-59-L (W.D.Va., July 10, 1986).

¶2

DISMISSED.

/805/f2d/393 · .json · Public domain