Vigil v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
805 F.3d 1199 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Keyes-Zachary v. Astrue · Chapo v. Astrue · Mays v. Colvin · Newbold v. Colvin · Watkins v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“found that 'the findings of a normal ability to recall items on immediate recall, and an ability to spell words forward, as well as finding of normal thought processes, indicate[d] that [the claimant] retain[ed] enough memory and concentration to perform at least simple tasks'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“some evidence indicating that [the claimant] had some problems with concentration, persistence, and pace 'such that [he] could not be expected to perform complex tasks[,]'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ALJ accounted for [a claimant's] moderate concentration, persistence, and pace problems in his RFC assessment by limiting him to unskilled work”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.