Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 P2D 374 - Cox v. State

Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dorman v. State · Rodriquez v. State · Jennings v. State · Anderson v. State · Haakanson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reports of sexual abuse were not inconsistent with the kinds of reports which other young victims of sexual abuse have made”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “effectively informed the jury that, in his expert opinion, [they] were telling the truth and had been abused by Nelson”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We have recognized a special danger when an expert is allowed to apply a novel psychological profile to identify a person as a member of a certain group or class in order to prove that the person [has] testified truthfully or acted unlawfully. ' Because the expert in effect assumes the role of human polygraph in such cases, we have ... required] the proponent of [such] evidence to demonstrate that the psychological profile involved in the case has been generally accepted as valid and that the expert’s testimony concerning the profile has particularized relevance to issues actually in dispute. We have never authorized expert testimony seeking to establish that a person is a member of a particular class or group, i.e., battered women or sexually abused children, by showing that [the person] exhibit[s] behavioral characteristics common to that group.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.