Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 P.2d 761 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
5
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Lopez (1994), State v. Worwood (2007)

1 district · 50 state decisions

260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · State v. Schlosser · State v. Deitman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'is not detained against his will " and remains free to leave. Id. (citation omitted). A level two encounter occurs when a police officer temporarily seizes an individual because the officer has a reasonable, "articulable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Lopez · State v. NIMER
  2. “must be `strictly tied to and justified by' the circumstances which rendered its initiation permissible.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Lopez · State v. Alverez
  3. “[clitizens do not surrender the protections of the Fourth Amendment simply because they are in an automobile. In fact, "stopping an automobile and detaining its occupants constitute[s] a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, even though the purpose of the stop is limited and the resulting detention quite brief."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Applegate · 2011 UT App 209 - State v. Duhaime

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.