State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably State v. Ramirez (1991), State v. Diaz (1993)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1867
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Doyle v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We believe that "the interest of predictability, accountability, and fairness" would be served by a more careful examination of when Utah’s appellate courts will consider issues not raised in the trial courts_ We further believe that the previously enunciated standards allowing first-time appellate review of issues are sufficiently liberal to provide appropriate redress, and are therefore troubled by a standard requiring review whenever a "liberty” interest is identified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Archambeau“A challenge to an individual juror may be either peremptory or for cause. A challenge to an individual juror may be made only before the jury is sworn to try the action, except the court may, for good cause, permit it to be made after the juror is sworn but before any of the evidence is presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Valdez“The general rule is, of course, that issues raised for the first time on appeal are not properly brought and will not be considered. ... This general rule applies even to constitutional issues, except where (1) a person’s liberty is at stake, ... and (2) exceptional circumstances are present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Archambeau
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.