Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

805 So. 2d 1033

Battle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-12-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2002

1 state decisions

Relies on Hall v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-12-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIS, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1James Earl Battle appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to Battle’s right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion, if he is able to do so. See Hall v. State, 784 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (stating that a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) claim for additional jail time credit for time spent at a drug treatment center must allege that the drug treatment center was the functional equivalent of jail).

¶2Affirmed.

COVINGTON, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.
/805/so2d/1033 · .json · Public domain