Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver

805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

479
cited by 479 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

474 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · State v. Dorthey · McDougall v. North Carolina · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 479 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “F. Any person convicted of any offense involving fisheries laws or regulations shall forfeit any permit or license issued to commercially take mullet and shall be forever barred from receiving any permit or license to commercially take mullet. [[Image here]] I. Except as provided in Subsection F of this Section, a violation of the provisions of this Section or of any of the regulations adopted pursuant thereto shall be a class six violation, R.S. 56:36.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that a statute is subsequently amended to lessen the possible penalty does not extinguish liability for the offense committed under the former statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.