Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 So. 2d 175 - Lenard v. Dilley

805 So. 2d 175 - Lenard v. Dilley’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance (2009), 952 So. 2d 653 - Rabalais v. Nash (2007)

42 state decisions

230200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 617 So. 2d 885 - Touchard v. Williams · Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance · State v. Vinzant · City of Amarillo v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “however, connotes conduct more severe than negligent behavior.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “I write separately to express my belief that it is poor policy for this court to grant certiorari in cases where the decision appealed is one granting a motion in limine, a motion which is not provided for by our Codes, but has come into being by trial practice. Reviewing decisions stemming from motions in limine is, in my view, an inefficient allocation of this court’s already strained judicial time and resources because decisions relating to such motions are generally made prior to trial, are interlocutory rulings that can be changed by the trial court during the course of trial, and often reach this court without a developed record upon which to review the trial court’s decision. Id. at 181 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a question to be determined by the jury after being instructed on the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.