805 So. 2d 577 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · Brown v. State · 597 So. 2d 182 - Bass v. State · 540 So. 2d 1 - Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On the other hand, in cases such as Wright’s, where some other qualification [besides having a case pending in the same court] is in question, the statute itself- provides that “[t]he lack of any such qualifications on the part of one or more jurors shall not, however, vitiate an indictment or verdict.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we agree with the case law and find that this was not such an error as to require the verdict and sentence in this case to be overturned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he lack of any such qualifications on the part of one or more jurors shall not ... vitiate any indictment or verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.