Ex Parte Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bd. of Sch. Com'rs of Mob. Cty. v. Wright · Kellum v. Jones · 419 So. 2d 601 - Satterfield v. Satterfield · 671 So. 2d 83 - State Ex Rel. Howard v. Howard · 513 So. 2d 630 - Croft v. Croft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The figure calculated by using Form CS-42 is accorded a rebuttable presumption that it is the correct amount of child support to be awarded. . . . Rule 32(A), Ala. R. Jud. Admin.; Rolen v. Pickering , 628 So.2d 850 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993). . . . In addition, a trial court can make a child-support award that deviates from the recommended figure as calculated according to the Guidelines, but to support such a deviation the court must make written findings of fact based upon evidence presented to it. Rule 32(A)(1); State Dep't of Human Res. v. J.B. , 628 So.2d 889 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.