Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

805 So. 2d 76

M.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-01-16

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2013

4 state decisions

Relies on S.R.A. v. State · C.W. v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-01-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the disposition order on appeal. See C.W. v. State, 793 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, we agree with appellant that, after witholding adjudication of delinquency, the trial court erred in failing to specify that the maximum period of time he may serve on community control is until his nineteenth birthday. See S.R.A. v. State, 766 So.2d 277, 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(holding that where adjudication is withheld, the trial court may impose an indeterminate sentence of community control that cannot go beyond a child’s nineteenth birthday). Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to make this correction.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED, in part.

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/805/so2d/76 · .json · Public domain