Rambo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-07-18

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2016

1 district · 12 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“any right Rambo might have to file a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the Department of Correction's denial of gain time in the circuit court in the county where he is incarcerated pursuant to Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Rambo v. State

Relies on Pagliaro v. Penske Auto Centers, Inc. · Newsome v. Singletary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-07-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SILBERMAN, Judge.

¶1Gary R. Rambo appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Rambo might have to file a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850 and Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc), or any right Rambo might have to file a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the Department of Correction’s denial of gain time in the circuit court in the county where he is incarcerated pursuant to Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

¶2Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.