Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

805 So. 2d 882

Docket No. 2D01-3281.

Caraballo v. State

Nelson CARABALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 26, 2001.

Rehearing Denied October 31, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-09-26

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 993 So. 2d 1014 - Ramey v. Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (2008), 803 So. 2d 821 - McCloud v. State (2001)

25 state decisions

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-09-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PER CURIAM.

¶2Nelson Caraballo seeks review of the trial court's order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Caraballo argues that the trial court erred in assessing victim injury points for sexual battery without a jury finding that victim injury was proven beyond a reasonable doubt as required by Apprendi v. New Jersey,530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). However, relief under Apprendi is limited to those defendants whose sentences were increased beyond the statutory maximum. Id. at 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348. In this case, the statutory maximum for sexual battery, a first-degree felony, is thirty years. § 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). Because Caraballo's twenty-three-year sentence does not exceed this statutory maximum, he is not entitled to relief under Apprendi.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

/805/so2d/882 · .json · Public domain