Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

805 So. 2d 926

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-10-31

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2010

4 state decisions

Relies on 705 So. 2d 1379 - State v. Mancino

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Eric 0. Williams appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm as to Williams’ first claim without comment. Williams’ second claim cannot be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379 (Fla.1998). We therefore affirm as to it without prejudice to any right Williams might have to raise it in a timely filed rule 3.850 motion.

¶2Affirmed.

BLUE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
/805/so2d/926 · .json · Public domain