Rice v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on O'BRYAN v. State · McManus v. State · Beets v. State · Duff-Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Remuneration means a pecuniary reward given or received because of some act. The act must be done for the purpose of receiving some benefit. The focus is on the defendant’s state of mind and the State is obligated to offer evidence which establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s intent or state of mind as related to an expectation of remuneration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Speer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.