Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 SW2D 478 - Strong v. State

Strong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 188th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Gilbert v. California · Moran v. Burbine · Huddleston v. United States · Rita v. United States · Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When words are not defined in the code, they are 'to be taken and understood in their usual acceptation in common language.' " Id. (quoting CRIM. PROC . art. 3.01). "In the organized crime statute, the legislature has specifically authorized conviction and punishment for both engaging in organized criminal activity and for any of the underlying offenses listed in section 71.02(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[c]onspires to commit' means that a person agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense and that person and one or more of them perform an overt act in pursuance of the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.