Schafer v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Christiansen v. Prezelski · David McDavid Pontiac, Inc. v. Nix · Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Forscan Corp. · Rowlett v. Colortek, Inc. · Candelier v. Ringstaff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If appellant requests or prepares a partial statement of facts, he shall include in his request or proposal a statement of the points to be relied on and shall thereafter be limited to such points. If such statement is filed, there shall be a presumption on appeal that nothing omitted from the record is relevant to any of the points specified or to the disposition of the appeal. Any other party may designate additional portions of the evidence to be included in the statement of facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.