Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 805 SW2D 737 - State v. Seidt

State v. Seidt’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · 114 Ill. App. 2d 81 - People v. Sweeney · Michaelson v. Wolf · Michaelson v. Wolf · State v. McDaniels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he party asserting the affirmative of the issue bears the burden of proof. Michaelson v. Wolf, 364 Mo. 356 , 261 S.W.2d 918, 924 [5] (Mo.1953). When Seidt filed a petition for release, he was asserting the affirmative of the issue and the burden was on him to prove the ground for release.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.