Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 F.2d 1262 - Fano v. B O'Neill

Fano v. B O'Neill’s Empirical Analysis

806 F.2d 1262 · 1987

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Moosa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1999), Tefel v. Reno (1999)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

28019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Morton v. Ruiz · Schweiker v. Hansen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “they are not an exercise of delegated legislative power and do not purport to be anything other than internal house-keeping measures.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “party must allege more than mere negligence, delay, inaction, or failure to follow an internal agency guideline.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a party seeking to estop the government bears a quite heavy burden”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.