Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 F.2d 1373 - Carter v. McCarthy

Carter v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

806 F.2d 1373 · 1986

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
5
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

115 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Bonin v. Calderon (1995), Norris v. Risley (1989)

115 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

10201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Boykin v. Alabama · Hill v. Lockhart · Brady v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o the extent that we are required to review a magistrate's findings of fact and a district court's adoption of such findings, we apply a clearly erroneous standard.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Determining the voluntariness of a plea involves a review of all the relevant circumstances surrounding it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for purposes of determining whether a plea is voluntarily and intelligently made, the critical fact is not that the imposition of the parole term is mandatory but that the parole term is to be served in addition to the term of the confinement under the sentence. In these circumstances, the judge handling the criminal proceedings must advise the defendant, inter alia, of the maximum period his liberty may be restrained both by way of imprisonment and parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.