Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 F.2d 1402 - Clementson v. Brock

Clementson v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

806 F.2d 1402 · 1986

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2017

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 2011 · 38 U.S.C. § 2012 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Heckler v. Chaney · Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Geltman Industries, Inc. · Legal Aid Society v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “VEVRA states that, after investigation of a section 2012 complaint, OFCCP need only ‘take appropriate action in accordance with the terms of the contract and applicable laws and regulations.’ 38 U.S.C. § 2012 (b). It provides no indication of what ‘appropriate action’ is; it lists no factors for OFCCP to consider in making that determination; and it specifies no standards for a court to use in cabining the agency’s discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Such action is unreviewable, for there is simply 'no law to apply.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.