Vito J. Pitta, as President of the New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council, Afl-Cio v. Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Millard Cass’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Andrews v. Education Ass'n (1987), Woods v. Saturn Distribution Corp. (1996)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. · Mills v. Alabama · Florasynth, Inc. v. Pickholz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The mere appearance of bias that might disqualify a judge will not disqualify an arbitrator.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The relationship between a party and the arbitrator may, in some circumstances, create a risk of unfairness so inconsistent with basic principles of justice that the arbitration award must be automatically vacated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the subject of the arbitrable grievance directly concerns the arbitrator's own employment for what may be an extended period of time, impermissible self-interest requires his disqualification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.