Jackson v. Franklin County School Board’s Empirical Analysis
806 F.2d 623 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Wb Ej Ej v. Matula, Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education (1989)
19 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Goss v. Lopez · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Wisconsin v. Yoder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Act's procedural guarantees are not mere procedural hoops through which Congress wanted state and local educational agencies to jump. Rather, `the formality of the Act's procedures is itself a safeguard against arbitrary or erroneous decision making.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“before the filing of a civil action ... seeking relief that is also available under this subchapter,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. W.B., Parent of the Minor, E.J., on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Son, E.J. v. Joan Matula Mary Angela Engelhardt Judy Beach Catherine Brennan Patricia Cericola Dr. Gary Danielson Ann Pearce Kathleen Mahony Carol Burns Florence Noctor Dr. Jeffrey Osowski New Jersey State Board of Education Warren County Department of Education Mary Lou Varley Mansfield Board of Education State of New Jersey Department of Education Division of Special Education Employees of the Mansfield Township Board of Education · Wb Ej Ej v. Matula“remedial educational services may be more valuable than any pecuniary damages that could be awarded”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. W.B., Parent of the Minor, E.J., on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Son, E.J. v. Joan Matula Mary Angela Engelhardt Judy Beach Catherine Brennan Patricia Cericola Dr. Gary Danielson Ann Pearce Kathleen Mahony Carol Burns Florence Noctor Dr. Jeffrey Osowski New Jersey State Board of Education Warren County Department of Education Mary Lou Varley Mansfield Board of Education State of New Jersey Department of Education Division of Special Education Employees of the Mansfield Township Board of Education · Wb Ej Ej v. Matula
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.