Victorian v. Miller

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 2, 1986.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-12-02

<p>ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC</p> <p>(Opinion August 4, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 796 F.2d 94)</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1986

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Victorian v. Miller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-12-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jeffrey J. Skarda, Gulf Coast Legal Foundation, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Joseph W. Barbisch, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appel-lees.

¶3Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

¶4ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶5(Opinion August 4, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 796 F.2d 94)

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶8 *82IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument.