Tuggle v. Seabold’s Empirical Analysis
806 F.2d 87 · 1986
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Summers v. Utah (1991), Stamps v. Rees (1987)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Wainwright v. Sykes · Doyle v. Ohio · Picard v. Connor · Raphan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any dispositive report and recommendation by a magistrate judge is subject to de novo review 'of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The test for harmless constitutional error is whether a court is 'able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baldwin v. Scroggy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.