Bayramoglu v. Estelle’s Empirical Analysis
806 F.2d 880 · 1986
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Jeffries v. Wood (1997), Marino v. Vasquez (1987)
64 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Smith v. Phillips · Fahy v. Connecticut · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the extrinsic material was actually received, and if so, how; (2) the length of time it was available to the jury; (3) the extent to which the jury discussed and considered it; (4) whether the material was introduced before a verdict was reached, and if so, at what point in the deliberations it was introduced; and (5) any other matters which may bear on the issue of ... whether the introduction of extrinsic material [substantially and injuriously] affected the verdict.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A timely instruction from the judge usually cures the prejudicial impact of evidence unless it is highly prejudicial or the instruction is clearly inadequate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In conducting their deliberations, '[j]urors have a duty to consider only the evidence which is presented to them in open court.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.