Abril-Rivera v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
806 F.3d 599 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 5174
Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Clark County School District v. Breeden · United States v. Zannino · Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a defendant can do this then the burden travels once more to the plaintiff to show that the reason is pretext and that retaliatory animus was the real motivating factor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the burden swings to the defendant 'to articulate a legitimate, non- retaliatory reason for its employment decision.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“far too temporally remote from the challenged actions to support an inference of causality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.