Valer v. Bartelson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm Bureau · Rolette County Social Service Board v. B.E. · Rebel v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. · Gustafson v. Estate of Poitra · Lindemann v. Lindemann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he conservator ... will be empowered to investigate and pursue any inappropriate expenditures from the ward’s funds if the conservator deems it appropriate so to do.... [Transfers Ralph made to Jean Valer, Jane Haught and Diane Fischer in December of 2007 of $12,000 and in January of 2008 of $60,000 will not be contested but all other, transfers are subject to review by the conservator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Estate of Bartelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.