Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 P2D 272 - Osborne v. State

Osborne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2016

22 state decisions

140199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · Frias v. State · Harvey v. State · Griffin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the length of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant's assertion of [his] right; and (4) the prejudice to the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[U]nder constitutional analysis, the speedy trial clock starts to run upon arrest or when the complaint is filed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is advisory in nature and is a factor to be considered in the balancing test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.