Perotti v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2022
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Robin · Doering v. Fader · Amidon v. State · United States v. Crovedi · State v. City of Anchorage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is plain that a fair-minded person could not rationally come to that conclusion on the basis of the known facts”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dussault · RJM v. State“feels that, for any reason, a fair and impartial decision cannot be given.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mustafoski v. State · RJM v. State“In Perotti's case, Judge Hodges' belief that he could actually be impartial deserves great deference, and the record contains little countervailing evidence of actual bias to overcome [the judge's] finding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.