Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 P2D 330 - State v. Mouser

State v. Mouser’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
6
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2024

20 state decisions

1001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · United States v. MacDonald · United States v. Loud Hawk · Moore v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the very least, the accused must show that but for the delay, he would have been able to present favorable evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Ujnexplained delays of fourteen months or more [are] presumptively prejudicial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The general rule [is] that the speedy trial right attaches at the time of arrest or formal charge, whichever comes first. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.