State v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) The magistrate must insert a direction in the warrant that it be served in the daytime, unless the affidavits or oral testimony state a reasonable cause to believe a search is necessary in the night to seize the property prior to it being concealed, destroyed, damaged or altered, or for other good reason; in which case he may insert a direction that it be served any time of the day or night.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rowe · State v. Ruiz

2. “primarily a factual question of intent to voluntarily relinquish a reasonable expectation of privacy, which may be inferred from `words spoken, acts done, and other objective facts.'”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 2002 UT App 426 - State v. Holbert · 2003 UT App 410 - State v. Rynhart

3. “When a search warrant has been issued authorizing entry into any building ... the officer executing the warrant may use such force as is reasonably necessary to enter: [[Image here]] (2) Without notice of his authority and purpose, if the magistrate issuing the warrant directs in the warrant that the officer need not give notice. The magistrate shall so direct only upon proof, under oath, that the object of the search may be quickly destroyed, disposed of, or secreted, or that physical harm may result to any person if notice were given.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rosenbaum · Salt Lake City v. Trujillo