Woods v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 742 So. 2d 1190 - Scott v. State · 764 So. 2d 411 - Farris v. State · 752 So. 2d 416 - Ratliff v. State · Wardley v. State · Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. State“`counsel's choice of whether to file certain motions, call witnesses, ask certain questions, or make certain objections falls within the ambit of trial strategy' and cannot give rise to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“this Court does not second guess an attorney on matters of strategy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.