Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 So. 2d 150 - State v. Thompson

806 So. 2d 150 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Mendenhall · Horton v. California · State v. Sepulvado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While probable cause must be determined on the totality of the circumstances, an informant’s reliability, veracity and basis of knowledge are “all highly relevant.” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 [, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ](1983); State v. Ruffin, 448 So.2d 1274, 1278 (La.1984). A confidential informant may provide adequate information to establish probable cause for a warrantless | Parrest, so long as the basis for the informant’s knowledge and the informant’s reliability, when examined under the totality of the circumstances, are established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.