Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 806 SO2D 261 - State v. Hicks

State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Manypenny · United States v. Sanges · 693 So. 2d 377 - Benedict v. City of Hattiesburg · State v. Key · 777 So. 2d 16 - Morris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the issue of whether [a party] has standing to prosecute [an] appeal has not been raised by the parties, this Court may sua sponte address the question of standing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]rom a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, or a motion to quash an indictment, or an affidavit charging crime[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.