Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

806 So. 2d 446

806 So.2d 446

27 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 48

Reardon v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 3, 2002

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2002-01-03

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2011

5 state decisions

Relies on 634 So. 2d 153 - Sirmons v. State · Thompson v. State · State v. Reardon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-01-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So.2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So.2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.

¶2It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
/806/so2d/446 · .json · Public domain