806 So. 2d 642 - Corzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State · Stewart v. State · 573 So. 2d 293 - Medina v. State · 807 So. 2d 55 - Bruno v. State · 695 So. 2d 872 - Caison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause of the strict rules limiting claims for ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, the appellate courts typically reject the issue as both premature and requiring evidence beyond the appellate record”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Acosta v. State · Hamilton v. State“For example, failure to move for a judgment of acquittal when the State has not proved an essential element of its case, when it is clear that the State could not reopen its case to prove that essential element, amounts to ineffective assistance of counsel that may sometimes be adequately assessed from the record on direct appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“appellate courts make an exception to this rule when the ineffectiveness is obvious on the face of the appellate record, the prejudice caused by the conduct is indisputable, and a tactical explanation for the conduct is inconceivable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.