State v. Mims’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Dorthey · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment' or that the sentence amounted to nothing more than `the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering' and is `grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order to support the granting of a mistrial, the inference must be plain that the remark was intended to focus the jury's attention on the defendant's failure to testify.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“transcript of the guilty plea colloquy. A”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.