Stern v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

cited by 17 later decisions

states following

May 2018

most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 597 So. 2d 439 - STATE, DOTD v. Williamson · 375 So. 2d 1386 - Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc. · 439 So. 2d 428 - Roshto v. Hebert · 530 So. 2d 643 - EASTER SEAL SOC. CRIPPLED CHILDREN AND ADULTS OF LA., INC. v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. · 669 So. 2d 1293 - Daly v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“(2) In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based. (3) If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of success on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the proceeding, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable shall be affected by that determination.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Henry v. Lake Charles American Press, L.L.C. · 974 So. 2d 824 - Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors
“a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 879 So. 2d 390 - Darden v. Smith · 894 So. 2d 480 - Thompson v. Emmis Television Broadcasting
“The legislature finds and declares that there has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for redress of grievances. The legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. To this end, it is the intention of the legislature that the Article enacted pursuant to this Act shall be construed broadly.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Lamz v. Wells · 830 So. 2d 1037 - Lee v. Pennington

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.