Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “WhEe each sale was a discrete offense, aE sales were part of a single ongoing criminal scheme. We find that there is a factual basis in the record for concluding that appeEant was crim-inaEy responsible for the fraudulent sale of driEing programs to individuals not named in the indictments; that these fraudulent sales were made pursuant to the same course of criminal conduct giving rise to the offenses to which appeEant confessed and for which she was convicted; and that the money invested pursuant to this fraudulent scheme totalled $130,358.17.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Martin v. State

2. “[D]ue process requires that before restitution may be awarded to any person, there must be a factual basis in the record supporting the conclusion that the defendant was criminally responsible for the injury to that person; that the injury directly resulted from the offense for which the defendant was found guilty or from the same course of criminal conduct giving rise to the conviction; and that the amount of restitution ordered is reasonable and just.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Connor v. State

3. “appears to have been based on evidence that as many as forty persons purchased program agreements involving [various leases], investing a total of $130,358.17.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Martin v. State