United States v. Diozzi’s Empirical Analysis
807 F.2d 10 · 1986
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 9 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Locascio (1993), Ullmann v. State (1994)
34 federal appellate · 9 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McKaskle v. Wiggins · Flanagan v. United States · Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. Koller · Lawrence v. United States · Crist v. Cline L R
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“some discretion to limit the exercise of the right to counsel of choice when insistence upon it would disproportionately disadvantage the government or interfere with the ethical and orderly administration of justice....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Obtaining reversal for violation of such a right does not require a showing of prejudice to the defense, since the right reflects constitutional protection of the defendant's free choice independent of concern for the objective fairness of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e suggested that district court judges should exercise caution in disqualifying attorneys, especially if less serious means would adequately protect the government's interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.