Carillo v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
807 F.2d 1094 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Schmerber v. State of California · Murray v. Carrier · Rochin v. People of California · Picard v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Constitution ... 'does not insure that defense counsel will recognize and raise every conceivable constitutional claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The exhaustion requirement is not satisfied if petitioner presents new legal theories or new factual allegations in federal court that transform his case or cast it in a wholly different light.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Federal courts are bound by state law on the preclusive effect of state judgments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.