Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F.2d 127 - Jackson v. Bowen

Jackson v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

807 F.2d 127 · 1986

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
February 2008
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably Welter v. Sullivan (1991), Cummings v. Sullivan (1991)

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

250198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution v. Hill · Cornella v. Schweiker · Sorensen v. Fitzgerald · Donovan 84-5217 84-5245 v. Dialamerica Marketing Inc 84-5245 84-5217 · United States v. Acres of Land More or Less Situate in Vernon County State of Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly reasonable, well founded in law and fact, solid though not necessarily correct.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at least one permissible view of the evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[t]he special circumstances exception helps to ensure that the government can advance in good faith novel but credible interpretations of the law.” Jackson v. Bowen, 807 F.2d 127 , 128 n. 3 (8th Cir.1986).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.