Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F.2d 145 - Anderson v. Block

Anderson v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

807 F.2d 145 · 1986

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Williams v. Little Rock Municipal Water Works (1994), Wedow v. City of Kansas (2006)

18 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

30019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Love v. Pullman Co. · Burnett v. Grattan · Calder v. United States · Oubichon v. North American Rockwell Corp. · Patterson v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] plaintiff will be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies if the allegations of the judicial complaint are like or reasonably related to the administrative charges that were timely brought.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “like or reasonably related to the allegations of the [administrative] charge.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]o force a plaintiff to file a new administrative charge with each continuing incident of discrimination would create needless procedural barriers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.