Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

807 F.2d 1514

Docket No. 85-2347.

Benny v. Pipes

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-01-16

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-01-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2004

8 federal appellate ·

40198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James T. Bialac, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Ronald J. Greenhalgh, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Before PREGERSON, POOLE, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The court's opinion in this case filed September 5, 1986, 799 F.2d 489, is amended as follows:

¶2

At page 495, the parenthetical after the citation to Meredith v. Arizona, 523 F.2d 481, 482-83 (9th Cir.1975), which reads "single blow by guard is a substantive due process violation," is amended to read "single blow by a guard can be a substantive due process violation."

/807/f2d/1514 · .json · Public domain