Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

807 F.2d 175

Docket No. 86-7547.

Mullins v. Ca Neff

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 30, 1986. Decided Dec. 10, 1986.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on El-Amin Aka v. Gluckstern Sd W

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

Marty Dean Mullins, Sr., appellant pro se.

Thomas D. Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mullins v. Neff, C/A No. 85-0580-AM (E.D.Va., Feb. 18, 1986).

¶2

DISMISSED.

/807/f2d/175 · .json · Public domain