Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F.2d 322 - United States v. Traitz

United States v. Traitz’s Empirical Analysis

807 F.2d 322 · 1986

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2022

7 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1954 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act)

Relies on Plessy v. Ferguson · Porzig v. Nolden · United States v. Delker · United States v. Perry · United States v. Accetturo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the nature and seriousness of the offense charged; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person and the community that would be posed by the person’s release.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime ... [that] involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person, including — (A) the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and (B) whether, at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State, or local law; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.